Archive for WTF Do I Put This?

Sometimes the Mail Makes Me Go, What Now?

Somewhere between promiscuously spreading my personal information round the internet in pursuit of free stuff etc.*** and my charitable donations, I end up receiving a lot of unexpected junk mail.

Today, walking up the step pulling out the mailbox contents which will go directly into the bluebox I found an envelope addressed to me upon which was written in bold blue letters,

With 57¢ a day you can feed an elderly Jew.

This promise, I see from reading top left, has come to me from Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews® of Canada.  (I’m not the only one to think, “Jews®?” am I?)

 The contents of the Rabbi’s epistle clarify (and make me go, hmmmm, again).

There are more than 300,000 poor, elderly Jews in the former Soviet Union.  They endure hunger, bitter cold, and ill health because of Russia’s crippled economy.  More than 60 per cent have no family at all (many lost relatives during the holocaust).

Now I’m reminded of that little liturgy of yesterday afternoon when the boss came to address the Department to confirm that the recently vacated tenure-track French biblical position cannot and will not be refilled (and that’s another story, perhaps/likely the subject for later posts).  Anyway, when the question of fundraising came up, Il Dulce pronounced, you have to sell a story.

The story Rabbi Eckstein is selling me?  Above the salutation in faux handwriting (complete with the quotation marks):

“I look out my balcony and see grandmas and grandpas eating from garbage bins.  The fact that some strangers from overseas help – it’s unbelievable.” Brona, Achinsk, Russia

Below “Dear Friend,”

From her balcony five stories up, 80-year-old Brona can’t ignore the pitiful scenes of poverty in the streets below.  You see, her view is her window to the world, because asthma has left her unable to leave her apartment for eight years now.

It goes on and on, but to the point:

Yet, despite her hard life, on one special day each week Brona’s soul lights up …. Brona is one of the lucky ones.  Thanks to our supporters, an outreach worker visits her each week and brings food, medicine, heating fuel … [ellipsis in original] and friendly conversation.

On to the general appeal, back to Brona, back to the general appeal. 

Ok, now – I confess – I’ve exoticized Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein and in my head he recites the passage from which this particular program gets its name complete with an accent: “Is it not to share your food with the hungry and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter?“  (FYI, he leaves out the rest of the verse: “when you see the naked, to clothe him, and not to turn away from your own flesh and blood?”  And BTW – while I’m in a confessional mood - I liked Julie & Julia.)

To the IFCJ website.

No, the Rabbi is virtually indistinguishable from almost every administrator I’ve met in the last 20 years.

That’s not quite correct.  In fact, he’s more youthful and handsome than most administrators I know.  (Hmmmm, combine this remark with a pair of Meryl Streep appreciations – including a graphic Angels in America homage, for those of you who didn’t catch it - which also remind me that I also heart Babs and the Divine Miss M, and would love to see Jersey Boys, and I have to ask, am I in some sort of denial?)

Moving on.

Alright, Rabbi, I’m starting to buy the story.  But who are you selling it to exactly?  The answer perhaps explains why the rest of Isaiah 58.7, “not to turn away from your own flesh and blood,” was left out.  Not good for the pitch I reckon: some smartass-cheapass potential donor just might note that almost 40% of the old folks have some family, as well as ask, what of that flesh and blood that is the whole of the Jewish people? 

I’m not fishing for a rationale to reject his plea, rather I pose the question for the omission seems to point to the answer to the original question: the Rabbi is “proud to tell you that through the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews of Canada, thousands of kindhearted Christians reach out to people like Brona.”  Sure sure, I’m a Christian by default, certainly a goy by definition.

And before anybuddy gets (any more) offended, know that I know I’m almost sold.  Cynically, I’m led to investigate in search of the answer to the question, is everything with this outfit according to Hoyle?   (Please note that I avoided the all too obvious euphemism for legitimate here.)  Ok, BBB tells me that the “International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (IFCJ) meets the 20 Standards for Charity Accountability.”

Alright alright, Rabbi, between your letter, this impious post, and my oisbrenguer ways of late, I’m filled with di shuld.  Take my $50.00 and hand out a food box for two.  (I really wanted to give the $51 “to help provide hot, nutritious meals for an elderly Soviet Jew for three months” that the direct mailer asks of me, but the online donation form didn’t offer that option.)

***By the bye.  Remember the 100 free rosaries I got through the interwebz?  I’m now down to a couple of dozen.  First, I cancelled out the borderline blasphemy that went with the original order and the petition for ideas for what to do with them by giving an entire box to Father Ron who, upon learning from Jacques the librarian that I had them, told Jacques who told me, that he thought such things would make nice First Communion gifts.  Second, I gave away another dozen or so in something of the spirit of the educational mission of Holy Cross Family Ministries, and in my own pedagogical mission, to my World’s Living Religions class on the last day (with the disclaimer that I was neither proselytizing nor mocking) along with bunches of leftover Hallowe’en candy.

Leave a Comment

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands”

Among the boodles of new work I’m facing for next academic year is the prep for a pair of new courses:

RLST 2236 EL 01 The Spiritual Life: Institutions & Practices

This course examines the variety of religious vocations in the religions of the world in their institutional settings. Primary emphasis is placed upon life in the formal setting of the monastery and avowed ascetic practices, but consideration will also be given to other forms of quasi-ascetic religious living, like among the Amish, and priestly vocations. We will look at the social organization, economies and politics of such communities, and the relationship of religious communities to the outside world. Other themes considered include the place of gender, celibacy, poverty, education and medicine in monasticism around the world. (S) (lec 3) cr 3

and;

RLST 2237 EL 01 The Spiritual Life: Life Stories

This course examines the autobiographies, biographies and hagiographies of a variety of figures from the religions of the world. These spiritual life stories invite us to the consideration of the many facets of the religious life, such as conversation, confession, religious self-image, asceticism, veneration of saints, gender and religion, as well as the everyday life in religious communities.
(S) (sem/tut 3) cr 3

In selling the first of these courses, I’ve repeatedly advertized them to this year’s classes with the shocking promise of a week’s worth of lectures on flagellation.  Of course, I’ve thought, should I REALLY do that?  I’ve been mostly inclined to do it nonetheless: religious life –> asceticism –> active mortification (self- or at the hands of another).  And so much good historical and popular stuff to draw from: Da Vinci Code and Opus Dei and dreamy albino self-flagellating Paul Bettany, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, the real Medieval Flagellants and all that other fabulous stuff from one of my favourite book-possesions, a very old edition of Flagellation & the Flagellants: A History of the Rod in All Countries from the Earliest Period to the Present Time by Rev. Wm. M. Cooper, B.A.

If I’ve been wavering about lecturing on BDSM for God, I’m tipping more in favour of it now.  For catching up on posts over at Dangerous Minds, I hit upon a post about Christian Domestic Discipline.  Who knew!

And doing a little extra research (ie. Googling it)  I hit upon this marvelous resource for all you devout couples out there which are burdened with an impiously unruly wife, CDD (which, I see, is linked in the DM post):

This website is intended to be a haven for married couples who practise safe and consensual Christian Domestic Discipline (CDD), or for those who would like to learn more about CDD. It is intended to provide support and encouragement for those who believe in traditional Christian marriage, with the husband as the head of the household, and the wife as his helpmeet.

This website is intended to provide a refuge for those interested in a Christian Domestic Discipline marriage. Here they might find information and share fellowship with other CDD couples without having to wade through pornography, warped practises, or distorted ideals of what we believe God created for marriage. This site is not the typical “spanking” site prevalent on the web. This site focuses mainly upon improving marital relationships by sharing the guidelines and marital roles listed in God’s Word.

I think the Dangerous Minds folk are correct:

The justification in their minds seems to be of a theological nature, an ass-slapping triad of master. slave and heavenly father! Take out the Christian references to a supernatural power and what is being described here is no different from a bog standard BDSM website.

However, it’s a bit prudish and fallacious on their part to go on to argue that:

If it’s not a zany form of Christian BDSM, then the alternate explanation of CDD must be that it’s a justification for domestic abuse invoking a higher authority. That’s where it transitions from kooky to sinister. One website tells husbands when it’s appropriate to spank their wives in front of the children! The “you’d better keep yourself up, or else” and the “look what you made me do” bullying aspect of this is simply appalling.

Though many still argue that extreme or even middle of the road BDSM is pathological or veiled abuse, I seriously doubt DM’d be prepared to argue that or connect it to wife-beating. 

And without real proof of a connection between CDD, Christianity and/or spousal abuse, I see nothing sinister here at all (or zany for that matter).  Rather, I don’t see anything more in CDD in the main than the self-same banality of Gorean, Medieval or Clown kink, and pretty much every other kind of durdy role-playing.

 

Spank me, Daddy!  Spank me … for Big Daddy!

***

BTW, while it remains in bureaucratic limbo, this course is not dead and I intend to revive its approval process this year too, among all that admin-type work I’ve got to do:

RLST 22** EL: Religion and Sexuality

This course examines traditional religious attitudes and responses to human sexuality, from ways in which it is controlled or proscribed, to ways in which it is celebrated or embraced.  Major themes considered include: monasticism/chastity; religion and the body; fertility rites; the religious aspects of marriage; religious attitudes toward homosexuality; tantra; sexuality in New Religious Movements; and, sexual imagery in religious literature. (S) (lec 3) 3 credits

Surely this will be a fine place to reuse my flagellation/CDD lectures.  (The sales pitch will include the gag, “sorry, there is no practicum for this class.)

Also, this course will give me the motivation I need to finally read through all those University of Chicago Press books I got on sodomy (for 5 bux each) to which I’ve referred in mixed company just for fun - my boss’s discomfort and lame attempt at deflective humour was a big smile.

***

Now having finished this, I’m continuing with my work-avoidance by finishing up Story of the Eye by Georges Bataille. ;)

Comments (1)

To a Thesaurus

O precious code, volume, tome,
Book, writing, compilation, work,
Attend the while I pen a pome,
A jest, a jape, a quip, a quirk.

For I would pen, engross, indite,
Transcribe, set forth, compose, address,
Record, submit–yea, even write
An ode, an elegy to bless–

To bless, set store by, celebrate,
Approve, esteem, endow with soul,
Commend, acclaim, appreciate,
Immortalize, laud, praise, extol.

Thy merit, goodness, value, worth,
Experience, utility–
O manna, honey, salt of earth,
I sing, I chant, I worship thee!

How could I manage, live, exist,
Obtain, produce, be real, prevail,
Be present in the flesh, subsist,
Have place, become, breathe or inhale

Without thy help, recruit, support,
Opitulation, furtherance,
Assistance, rescue, aid, resort,
Favour, sustention, and advance?

Alack! Alack! and well-a-day!
My case would then be dour and sad,
Likewise distressing, dismal, gray,
Pathetic, mournful, dreary, bad.

Though I could keep this up all day,
This lyric, elegiac, song,
Meseems hath come the time to say
Farewell! Adieu! Good-by! So long!

– Franklin P. Adams, collected in Carolyn Wells, The Book of Humorous Verse, 1920.

via Futility Closet.

Leave a Comment

And Me Happiest When I Read Poems

It seemed to me that I hadn’t really sought out poetry since Irving Layton died.

I realize now that’s not entirely true.  There was that late night bacchanal wherein I was moved to recite:

Her lips were round and full
And to his lap she bent;
He saw no car ahead
And when he came he went.

and

I placed
my hand
upon
her thigh.

By the way
she moved
away
I could see
her devotion
to literature
was not
perfect.

In any case, poetry has found me repeatedly this week – despite an inauspicious beginning poetry-wise as I read, “To write poetry after Auschwitz is barbaric.”

But subsequent to that, my newly formed CBC Radio One habit led me to -

How happy is the little Stone
That rambles in the Road alone,
And doesn’t care about Careers
And Exigencies never fears –
Whose Coat of elemental Brown
A passing Universe put on,
And independent as the Sun
Associates or glows alone,
Fulfilling absolute Decree
In casual simplicity –

(Only the rhyme keeps me from dispairing about my new enthusiasm for things administrative.)

Moving on.  This morn I learned that P.K. Page has died.

That took me back to all that Canlit I sometimes suffered, more often really dug as an undergrad.  Among the latter, this:

The Stenographers

After the brief bivouac of Sunday,
their eyes, in the forced march of Monday to Saturday,
hoist the white flag, flutter in the snow-storm of paper,
haul it down and crack in the mid-sun of temper.

In the pause between the first draft and the carbon
they glimpse the smooth hours when they were children–
the ride in the ice-cart, the ice-man’s name,
the end of the route and the long walk home;

remember the sea where floats at high tide
were sea marrows growing on the scatter-green vine
or spools of grey toffee, or wasps’ nests on water;
remember the sand and the leaves of the country.

Bells ring and they go and the voice draws their pencil
like a sled across snow; when its runners are frozen
rope snaps and the voice then is pulling no burden
but runs like a dog on the winter of paper.

Their climages are winter and summer–no wind
for the kites of their hearts–no wind for a flight;
a breeze at the most, to tumble them over
and leave them like rubbish–the boy-friends of blood.

In the inch of the noon as they move they are stagnant.
The terrible calm of the noon is their anguish;
the lip of the counter, the shapes of the straws
like icicles breaking their tongues, are invaders.

Their beds are their oceans–salt water of weeping
the waves that they know–the tide before sleep;
and fighting to drown they assemble their sheep
in colums and watch them leap desks for their fences
and stare at them with their own mirror-worn faces.

In the felt of the morning the calico-minded,
sufficiently starched, insert papers, hit keys,
efficient and sure as their adding machines;
yet they weep in the vault, they are taut as new curtains
stretched upon frames.  In their eyes I have seen
the pin men of madness in marathon trim
race round the track of the stadium pupil.

I wonder how many of my students are exposed to such stuff these days.  Certainly I know they don’t live enough with better language and noted with dismay in my night class Wednesday that not a half minute went by after I called the break before virtually every one of my +30 students commenced to texting.   And today I find that Page expressed better my thoughts on this.

From The Victoria Times Colonist:

She had strong opinions on language, worrying about its future: “It’s becoming computer language and I think we are either going to be capable of telepathy in the future, and not need language at all, or our language will turn into a series of snorts and grunts.”

Ok, time to head to the far side of town in search of a new suit, deluding myself my new suitness be overcome with a tasteful purchase.  If the shops’ offerings don’t meet the need, new shirts and ties will suffice to feed the longing.  Mmmm, New Dawn Drapery.

And the song I can’t get out of my head is Chunk Chuchunk Chunk Chunk Chunk by The Selectrics.  I wanna be a Mad Man.  A Roger and a Dick.

Leave a Comment

Avatontas

For those who’ve seen Avatar (and I swear I’m going to) is this pretty much it?

(BTW, on Avatar and everything else, I think Ross Douthat and Jonah Goldberg are BFIs, but I’ve got nothing more clever to say than that.)

via boingboing via The Next Web.

Comments (1)

There’s Been Some Brave Publishers Out There

ABE was an early internet find of mine and I’ve bought stuff through there (A History of the Rod in All Countries, from the Earliest Period to the Present Time is still my favourite purchase). 

But more than that, ABE has been one of those sites I liked to surf, just looking for oddities, 1st editions, autographed copies, and documents of some historical interest. 

And the site has a new feature: the Weird Book Room!

My favourites:

The Romance of Proctology Which is the Story of the History and Development of This Much Neglected Branch of Surgery From Its Earliest Times to the Present Day, Including Brief Biographic Sketches of Those Who Were Its Pioneers.
Yes, glove is a many splendored thing.

Impeccable Birdfeeding: How to Discourage Scuffling, Hull-Dropping, Seed-Throwing, Unmentionable Nuisances and Vulgar Chatter at Your Birdfeeder.
Durdy pigeons are really makin’ my Project Feederwatch counts look bad.

What’s Wrong With My Snake? A User-Friendly Home Medical Reference Manual (The Herpetocultural Library).
Oh, it’s herpetological.

Gangsta Rap Coloring Book.
You’re not the boss of me; I can colour my MAC-10 Atomic Tangerine if I wanna.

The Pop-Up Book of Phobias.
With every turn of the page I’d be screamin’ like a little girl.

Monk Habits for Everyday People: Benedictine Spirituality for Protestants.
K, seriously, I think I actually want this book for one or both of my “Spiritual Life” courses next year.

The Haunted Vagina.
“It’s difficult to love a woman whose vagina is a gateway to the world of the dead.”
Um … no, not even going to touch this one.

via Dangerous Minds.

Leave a Comment

Do all Non-Chain Coffee Shops Have to Have a Punning Name?

K, at first I thought the Central Perk in Friends was cute.  But as that cutsey show fulla white ppl with jobs where they didn’t seem to really work progressed, so that pun grated.  In that spirit, I give you:

Rimsky-Korsakoffee House, where “each table is named for deceased composers!”

Leave a Comment

“Qui peut dire où vont les fleurs?” or, I Still Hate “In Flanders Fields”

When I was a child in the early ’70s we always gathered in the school gym for a Remembrance Day assembly (not on Remembrance Day, BTW, since that, my Ontarian friends, is a statutory holiday in Saskatchewan).  And as cheesy as it was then, to my 7 or 8 year old way of thinking, as an adult, in the world as it is, I’m feeling sentimental about those assemblies.

And since Mary Travers died this year, I’m giving into a naïve peacenik sentimentality of a long time ago.

And also since -  as I’ve suggested in the past - so much of the discourse of war and remembrance in my country consists of sacrificial satisfaction, I’d catch the torch from the failing hands of Pete Seeger and Joe Hickerson, Mary Travers and Marlene Dietrich, and so many others, hold it high and take up the quarrel with their foe.

From the CBC yesterday:

Canada’s top commander says he will withdraw all of the country’s soldiers from the region by 2011.

“The parliamentary motion directs that it will be the end of the military mission in July of 2011. I mean those are the words that are there …. And for me it’s pretty clear. What we do for the Canadian Forces are military missions.”

….

The government has insisted Canada’s military mission will end in 2011. But its ministers and staff — including Defence Minister Peter MacKay — have suggested Canadian soldiers could remain in Afghanistan beyond that deadline, though perhaps not in combat.

Speaking before a parliamentary committee last month, MacKay said they would shift to a role that focuses on more development, reconstruction, training and helping Afghans enhance their own security.

….

But Natynczyk said he couldn’t see a role for any soldiers in Kandahar that would respect parliament’s declaration.

“We provide protection, we provide security, we enable governance, we enable development, we enable training. But our function is security and protection. That’s the military mission.”

Asked if there’s any role for Canadian soldiers in a non-military deployment, Natynczyk said there will be some representatives in Kabul as part of the embassy staff.

“But right now, everything else we do is a security mission, is providing protection and security.”

And all of that is to say, this mission is far from over.  (You know I heard a townie on TV actually refer to it as peacekeeping.)  Now all we need is a change in government – and it doesn’t really matter what sort of change - to cinch the continuation of this rudderless misadventure.

I hate “In Flanders Fields” because it’s evoked with such maudlinist dedication on this day, in this age.  Really, the poppy fields to which we ought to give unvarnished consideration – especially on this day - lie in the valleys of a god-forsaken country on the margins of two civilizations, shot up by zealots, gangsters and several species of foreign interloper.

Ironic that the pious in our country recite a psalm from a century ago whose governing imagery, where it grows in a warzone of ours at present, is responsible for untold deaths among the zealots, gangsters and foreigners who fight over it as a resource.

And more importantly, that it kills 10s of 1000s every year around the world, despite our attempts to destroy it so that the gangsters and zealots can’t profit from it. 

Where have all the flowers gone?  Into the veins of the lowest of the low of almost every country on earth.  Lest we forget?  I can’t see how we’re better off by remembering.

Leave a Comment

“Featuring: Mysticism, Science, The Arts”

I recently inherited a stack of old issues of Rosicrucian Digest, the monthly journal published by the Rosicrucians AMORC (Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis). 

The Rosicrucian Digest was first published in 1915 under the name American Rosae Crucis, and then The Triangle, The Mystic Triangle and finally The Rosicrucian Digest.

I have almost all the issues from 1968 to 1972 and then a few from ’73, ’76 and ’80.

The magazine looks like any number of other special interest or religious subscription publications of the time (I got a few Plain Truths with these too) except for its peculiar Rosicrucian interests.  But those, set in a 60s/70s aesthetic, can appear especially jarring.

The format of the Digest remains very consistent throughout the issues I’ve seen, presenting the varied concerns of the Digest and the AMORC as a theosophical fraternity and group of institutions.

img553

The cover design changes only once through these issues.  Here’s the issue with the AMORC’s Rose-Croix University building, Rosicrucian Park, San Jose, CA.

  img554

The back covers of many issues present different sets of “Timeless Thoughts” from assorted mystics, philosophers and other authors or sources throughout history.

The back covers of other issues are dedicated to AMORC advertising for their major and minor publications as well as the other stuff sold once upon a time by the Rosicrucian Supply Bureau, like rings and cufflinks and such.  Otherwise, plenty of space within the journal is dedicated to the sale of AMORC product (tho the Digest was the only publication actually for sale). 

Invariably, the 1st page consists of a full page advert for the AMORC equivalent of Dianetics, The Mastery of Life. These ads for this book written for prospective members of the Order promise answers to all sorts of mysterious questions and, at the same time, to lead one to the personal fulfillment promised by every contemporary form of self-help.  As the examples show, you can learn to harness your own consciousness, auras, and even learn ESP for fun and profit. 

img561

img566

img570

 And no doubt this is just the kind of thing to appeal to one or more of the go-getters at Sterling Cooper. 

img572

Other advertizing is dedicated to the sale of new Digest subscriptions which come with the gift of a Rosicrucian tract on one topic or another like “The Unity of Mysticism” or the sacred fire kept by the vestal virgin:

img552

And speaking of vestal virgins, the news of the order reported occasionally includes the installation of the Supreme Colombe, “a ritualistic officer and symbolizes consciousness.  She holds the office until eighteen years of age.”

Looks like Job’s Daughters’ robes dressed up with a big rose.  And are those headdresses supposed to look Egyptian?

img562img568 

 

 

 

 

The masthead includes a statement of “The Purpose of the Rosicrucian Order:”

The Rosicrucian Order, which exists throughout the world, is a nonsectarian fraternal body of men and woman devoted to the investigation, study, and practical application of natural and spiritual laws. The purpose of the organisation is to enable everyone to live in harmony with the creative, constructive cosmic forces for the attainment of health, happiness, and peace. The Order is internationally known as the Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis and, in America and all other lands, constitutes the only form of Rosicrucian Activities united in one body. The A.M.O.R.C. (an abbreviation) does not sell its teachings. It gives them freely to affiliated members, together with many other benefits. For complete information about the benefits and advantages of Rosicrucian affiliation write a letter to the address below and ask for the free book, The Mastery of Life.

The Imperator, supreme leader of the AMORC, always provides an opening commentary or preface in the form of the “Thought of the Month” on any number of topics, but this ain’t no Lewis Lapham’s “Notebook.”  Among my favs: “Can Plants and Humans Communicate?” and “Awakening the Frozen Dead.”

Every issue is also peppered with short tracts or excerpts from publications by the first Imperator (and founder) Dr. H Spencer Lewis, F.R.C. (d. 1939).

img574

There aren’t enough religions with
the soul patch as part of  their iconography.

Every issue also contains a feature called “Medifocus.”  The Medici-Duvalier one is about the best one I found to, you know, produce a WTF reaction.  Runner up? Castro-Qaddafi. 

img555

The AMORC website says:

As you all know, our former Imperator, Frater Harvey Spencer Lewis, was a person of great intellect who was open-minded and truly ahead of his time. That is why he established what came to be called “Medifocus.” In Rosicrucian magazines and other documents throughout all of AMORC’s jurisdictions the names and portraits of heads of state were published. Each Rosicrucian was asked to send positive thoughts to these leaders so as to aid them in pursuing their mission as best as possible. Unfortunately, this concept had to be abandoned, because it was incorrectly perceived by the profane world, which had the wrong impression that we supported politicians who were sometimes cruel or dishonest. And, likewise, certain members of our organization also misunderstood this activity.

The magazine was, at the same time, a kind of National Geographic or CAA brochure of the spiritual or mystical.  Each issue contains one or more pix of significant mystical or religious sites around the world or documentation of exotic spiritual or religious activity.

This shot of Jacob Boehme’s museumized home struck me as oddly touristic.

img564

But then there’s stuff like this of funerary ghats in Nepal.

img560

The other – very short – articles that appear in these issues reflect, as the covers all promise, Mysticism, Science and The Arts, conceived as broadly as you could imagine, that is, to the theosophical horizons of Rosicrucian belief … and beyond.  ”Jazz and Being” argues for the mystical, authentic and democratic nature of them hep sounds.  Numerous articles appear on the topic of Karma, understood by Rosicrucians to be an idea explicit or implicit in (exoteric or esoteric to?) all the religions of the world – in keeping with the theosophical orientation of group.   AMORC’s philosophical, historical, mystical and theological ideas about Egypt are regularly represented.  The jonz for alchemy that AMORC – and all sorts of other groups like it from the late 19th century – had (obviously) coloured their sense of science.  The pseudo-scientific speculation in the journal articles reaches for some far out places.  ”Does Magnetism Prevent Frost Damage?”  “Do Thoughts Affect Plants?” ”Across the Species Line: Have Animals ESP Ability?” and “Electronic Communication with the Dead?”  An article on Antarctica, like others on geography, geology and the like, turns to questions related to the belief in the lost continents of Atlantis and Lemuria.

rosicruciansymbol2

Sadly, the AMORC doesn’t seem to be what it once was.  The Store doesn’t carry much of the goods it used to and so I’m sad that, short of some eBay or garage sale luck, I’m not likely to get my hands upon Rosicrucian cufflinks, nor one of these spooky Jesusses.

img569

Leave a Comment

Finishing the Master of the Mysteries

So I finished the Manly P. Hall bio.  I’m still not sure if it’s made me more interested in Spiritualism in North America or less.  It did leave me with two last bits of bizarre trivia.

manly-p-hall1)  In 1985 Charles Bukowski was married to Linda Lee Beighle in the Philosophical Research Society library in a ceremony presided over by Hall.

 

 

 

 

 

 354762

2) In 1964 Dr. Henry Drake, Hall’s right hand man for many years, brought a project of his own to fruition: selections of Plato set to music by Fred Katz and read by Sidney Freakin’ Poitier.  It’s available for download at a nominal cost, but I’m not paying for it.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.